How rwaUSD Works
This section explains how rwaUSD functions at an high level: who participates in the system, how collateral is evaluated and converted into rwaUSD, how risk is managed at scale, and why the design choices matter for both DeFi protocols and institutional users.
The objective of rwaUSD is not to tokenize new assets, but to make existing tokenized real-world assets usable, composable, and capital-efficient inside DeFi, without fragmenting liquidity or weakening solvency.
System Context and Significance
Today, there are already hundreds of tokenized Treasury-backed stablecoins, money-market instruments, and tokenized gold products live across public blockchains. Collectively, these instruments represent tens of billions of dollars in on-chain value, backed by underlying markets that are measured in the trillions (U.S. Treasuries alone exceed $25T outstanding; above $6T sits in short-duration T-Bills at any given time).
Despite this scale, only a small fraction of this value is actually usable inside DeFi. The limiting factor is not demand, it is integration and risk normalization. rwaUSD is designed to solve this by acting as a single, standardized collateral interface between tokenized RWAs and DeFi markets.
Key Actors in the rwaUSD System
1. Depositors (Users / Institutions)
Depositors are entities that already hold tokenized RWAs, such as:
Tokenized Treasury-backed stablecoins or money-market instruments
Short-duration, highly liquid tokenized government securities
Tokenized gold with transparent custody and deep secondary liquidity
These assets are already on-chain today, but are fragmented across issuers and structures. Depositors use them as collateral to mint rwaUSD.
2. Issuers and Custodians (Upstream)
Issuers and custodians are the regulated entities that originate and safeguard the underlying assets. These may include:
Asset managers
Banks
Regulated custodians and trust structures
Multipli does not require issuers to redesign assets for DeFi. Assets are evaluated as-is, based on liquidity, redemption mechanics, and operational robustness.
3. Multipli (Aggregation and Risk Layer)
Multipli is responsible for translating real-world asset behavior into DeFi-safe collateral logic. This includes:
Asset onboarding and eligibility determination
Liquidity and redemption stress analysis
Risk parameterization (haircuts, mint limits, buffers)
Liquidity class assignment
System-level reporting and transparency
This is where issuer-specific complexity is absorbed so that downstream protocols do not inherit it.
4. DeFi Protocols (Downstream)
DeFi protocols integrate rwaUSD as a single collateral asset, rather than hundreds of bespoke RWAs. These may include:
Lending and borrowing markets
Vaults and structured yield strategies
Liquidity pools and margin systems
For these protocols, rwaUSD behaves as a standardized, predictable collateral primitive.
An Example to Illustrate the Process
Core System Components
Collateral Vaults
Collateral vaults hold supported tokenized RWA collateral under defined custody and accounting rules. Vault behavior is governed by the asset’s assigned liquidity class and risk parameters.
Risk Engine
The risk engine determines:
Which assets qualify as eligible collateral
Applicable haircuts and solvency buffers
Mint-to-Value (MTV) limits
Liquidity class assignment
For example, highly liquid Treasury-backed instruments may support conservative MTV ranges (e.g., 70 - 85%), while assets with even minor liquidity constraints are assigned lower limits or separate classes. These figures are illustrative and subject to change as market conditions evolve.
Mint / Burn Module
The mint/burn module:
Mints rwaUSD against approved collateral
Burns rwaUSD during redemption
Enforces system-level constraints such as mint caps and liquidation thresholds
This ensures that rwaUSD supply always remains tied to eligible, risk-managed collateral.
Pricing and Transparency Layer
This layer publishes system health indicators, including:
Aggregate collateral composition
Liquidity class breakdowns
Risk buffers and exposure metrics
Transparency is critical when bridging RWAs into DeFi, where trust must be programmatic rather than reputational.
The Role of Insurance
rwaUSD is designed to incorporate an insurance framework underwritten by Lloyd’s of London, intended to provide coverage against defined adverse scenarios affecting eligible collateral.
This insurance framework is significant for three reasons:
Scale and credibility Lloyd’s underwrites risk across global insurance markets totaling hundreds of billions of dollars in annual premium volume, making it one of the most established risk markets globally.
Risk specificity The framework is structured to address defined risks such as de-pegging events, certain regulatory disruptions, or fraud at the collateral or custody layer—subject to final policy terms.
Layered protection Insurance is designed as a supplemental layer, not a replacement for over-collateralization, conservative MTV limits, liquidity segmentation, or system controls.
Importantly, coverage scope, triggers, and eligibility are governed by policy terms, and not all current or future collateral types may qualify for identical insurance coverage. The rwaUSD architecture is intentionally designed so that insurance strengthens the system without becoming a single point of dependency, allowing Multipli to support additional asset classes and liquidity profiles over time.
Lifecycle: Minting and Redemption
Step 0: Eligibility and Onboarding
Before minting, assets undergo eligibility checks that may include:
Supported token validation
Issuer and custodian due diligence
Liquidity and redemption analysis
Compliance or eligibility gates where applicable
This is where Multipli performs the work that would otherwise take DeFi protocols months or years to replicate.
Step 1: Deposit Collateral
A depositor supplies supported tokenized assets into the Multipli collateral framework or an approved routing path.
Step 2: Mint rwaUSD
rwaUSD is minted subject to conservative risk parameters.
Key concepts:
Mint-to-Value (MTV) Defines the maximum rwaUSD that can be minted per unit of collateral. Lower MTV values imply stronger solvency buffers.
Liquidation Point A predefined threshold where protective actions may be taken if collateral value declines or risk conditions worsen.
These parameters are central to ensuring rwaUSD remains solvent even under stressed market conditions.
Step 3: Deploy rwaUSD
Once minted, rwaUSD becomes fully composable and can be deployed across DeFi:
Lending markets
Liquidity pools
Structured yield strategies
Institutional allocation rails (where available)
This is where tokenized RWAs transition from static representations into productive capital.
Step 4: Redemption and Exit
To exit, users burn rwaUSD and receive the underlying asset or an equivalent redemption flow. Redemption timing depends on the liquidity class of the backing collateral.
Redemption Design Principles
Highly liquid backing assets Enable faster, more DeFi-compatible redemptions.
Assets with redemption windows or structural illiquidity Require redemptions that respect those windows or are isolated so that slower assets do not contaminate system-wide liquidity.
Why This Architecture Matters
If even 5 - 10% of the tokenized Treasury and gold supply already on-chain becomes DeFi-usable through a standardized layer like rwaUSD, it would represent tens of billions of dollars of new, high-quality collateral entering DeFi, without creating hundreds of new integrations or risk silos. This is not a marginal improvement. It is a structural shift in how real-world capital interfaces with onchain markets.
Last updated